Maximum feasible consent of the governed: exploring the experiences of low income board members at community action agencies in the Commonwealth of Virginia

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative, descriptive study is to inform the reader of the history and policies behind the community action system created in the 1960s, as well as to explore the concept of Maximum Feasible Participation Disparity Gaps. Studying them can be used to improve inefficiencies which may exist in the tripartite board of directors of community action agencies located in the United States and its territories. Policies and literature will be explored to identify the evolution of maximum feasible participation in the tripartite board system of community action agencies. Additionally, gaps in existing policies and practices and recommend solutions to minimize or alleviate the gaps in the tripartite board system of community action agencies will be explored. This research conducted seven (7) semi-structured interviews and analyzed documents from four (4) community action agencies in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Documents reviewed included websites, board membership lists, and agency program lists. Participants were recruited from 22 of the 31 community action agencies in Virginia. Of these, 21 are private, non-profit agencies, while one (1) is a statewide agency. Key takeaways from the research include a lack of participation on the part of the agencies in Virginia; concerns that low-income board members are overwhelmed with information; a lack of knowledge on the origins of community action; and strong participation in the study from agencies located in the Appalachian region of the state.--Author's abstract