Abstract

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the reference technique for the measurement of native maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter when surgery is being considered. However, there is a wide choice available for the methodology of maximum AAA diameter measurement on CTA, and to date, no consensus has been reached on which method is best. We analyzed clinical decisions based on these various measures of native maximum AAA diameter with CTA, then analyzed their reproducibility and identified the method of measurement yielding the highest agreement in terms of patient management. Three sets of measures in 46 native AAA were obtained, double-blind by three radiologists (J, S, V) on orthogonal planes, curved multiplanar reconstructions, and semi-automated-software, based on the AAA-lumen centerline. From each set, the clinical decision was recorded as follows: "Follow-up" (if all diameters <50 mm), "ambiguous" (if at least one diameter <50 mm AND at least one ≥50 mm) or "Surgery " (if all diameters ≥50 mm). Intra- and interobserver agreements in clinical decisions were compared using the weighted Kappa coefficient. Clinical decisions varied according to the measurement sets used by each observer, and according to intra and interobserver (lecture#1) reproducibility. Based on the first reading of each observer, the number of AAA proposed for surgery ranged from 11 to 24 for J, 5 to 20 for S, and 15 to 23 for V. The rate of AAAs classified as "ambiguous" varied from 11% (5/46) to 37% (17/46). The semi-automated method yielded very good intraand interobserver agreements in clinical decisions in all comparisons (Kappa range 0.83-1.00). The semi-automated method seems to be appropriate for native AAA maximum diameter measurement on CTA. In the absence of AAA outer-wallbased software more robust for complex AAA, clinical decisions might best be made with diameter values obtained using this technique.

Highlights

  • Materials and MethodsThe maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the main parameter used to monitor patient care, since it is related to the risk of rupture

  • Clinical decisions varied according to the measurement sets used by each observer, and according to intra and interobserver reproducibility

  • We showed that clinical decisions varied according to the measurement sets used by each observer; that they varied between the first and second reading of a same observer, and between first readings of two observers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the main parameter used to monitor patient care, since it is related to the risk of rupture. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the reference technique for the measurement of AAA diameter when surgery is being considered. Mora et al [5] recently showed that even using precise methodology, the reproducibility of maximum diameter measurements of native AAA on CTA may not meet recommended thresholds. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the reference technique for the measurement of native maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter when surgery is being considered. We analyzed clinical decisions based on these various measures of native maximum AAA diameter with CTA, analyzed their reproducibility and identified the method of measurement yielding the highest agreement in terms of patient management. Intra- and interobserver agreements in clinical decisions were compared using the weighted Kappa coefficient

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call