Abstract

ObjectivesTo (1) examine the association between maturity timing and performance-based selection levels in (N=708) Australian male 100-m Freestyle swimmers (12–17 years); (2) identify the relationship between maturation status and 100-m Freestyle performance; and (3) determine whether Maturation-based Corrective Adjustment Procedures (Mat-CAPs) could remove maturation-related differences in swimming performance. MethodsIn Part 1, maturity timing category distributions (‘Early’, ‘Early Normative’, ‘Late Normative’ and ‘Late’) for ‘All’, ‘Top 50%’ and ‘25%’ of raw swimming times were examined within and across age-groups. In Part 2, multiple regression analyses quantified the relationship between maturity offset (YPHV) and swimming performance. In Part 3, sample-based maturity timing category distributions were examined based on raw and correctively adjusted swim times for 12–17 year old age-groups. ResultsBased on raw swim times, a high prevalence of ‘Early-maturing’ swimmers, with large effect sizes was identified (e.g., 14 years ‘All’ — χ2 (3, 151=111.98, p<0.001; ‘Early’ v ‘Late’ OR=82.0 95%CI=4.77, 1409.9); while a complete absence of ‘Late-maturers’ was apparent in the sample (N=708). When maturity categories were re-defined based on sample mean±standard deviation, and when using the expected curvilinear trendline identified in Part 2, Mat-CAPs mitigated maturity timing biases across all age-groups and selection levels, and removed the Freestyle performance advantage afforded by advanced maturity timing and status. ConclusionsRemoving the influence of maturation-related developmental differences could help improve youth swimmer participation experiences and improve the accuracy of identifying genuinely skilled age-group swimmers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call