Abstract
Psychic issues may influence apparatus functioning, and thus may lead to maturational variations. However, in this papper I have emphasized the converse: the influence of maturational variations on psychic issues. I have singled out for discussion three areas of the originally autonomous sphere: perception, motility, and language. The variations on which I have elaborated include: special sensitivities, maturational delays, and lags in achievement which we may perceive in the genetic background of our analytic patients. If such variations occur in the beginning of life, they primarily affect ego structuring, and anxiety and aggression potentials. In addition, they may leave imprints which may find later psychological expression as well. If they occur after the emergence of speech, symbolic thinking, and selfawareness, the resultant problems will contribute mainly to neurotic elaborations. Most important in tracing variations and their effects appears to be the organizing, integrative function. This function, already at work at the start of life, develops in accordance with its own biologically predetermined timetable. Viewed in this way, I would suggest that the organizing function itself may well be autonomous, since it does not arise out of conflict, and since, to use Hartmann's phrasing, it is "not acquired," but "rests on constitutional givens."
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
