Abstract
This text focuses on the problem of hope in a philosophical aspect. It has been based on the thought of st. Thomas, Roman Ingarden, Karol, Wojtyla, and particularly Gabriel Marcel. The author concentrates on two questions: 1. Are there any criteria to distinguish between two forms of hope: the first – that reveals reality, second – that deludes. 2. Can the experience of men in terms of natural, philosophical categories lead us to discovering and understanding hope? „To be future in the present” – is the existential position of hope. It ought to be based on reality, not on desires or dreams. Hope means: no situation of evil or fear is ultimate. It is not the prediction of the future. Transcendental acts of men are philosophical basis of hope (Marcel, Wojtyla); they oppose everything, that passes away, ultimately – they oppose death.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
