Abstract
Sexual dimorphism in body size is expected to vary as a function of mating system. Heske and Ostfeld (1990, J. Mammal. 71:510–519) found no difference in body-length dimorphism between the majority of promiscuous and monogamous microtines. In five species we used body mass and in three species, length of body to test the robustness of these findings. We found no significant dimorphism in length of body in any species, but significant dimorphism in body mass in all species, independent of mating system. We propose that 1) mass rather than length is the measure needed to assess dimorphism in microtines, and 2) the bias in favor of large males should rank as follows with respect to mating system: facultative monogamy = polygyny > promiscuity > obligate monogamy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
