Abstract

BackgroundDespite having predominately deleterious fitness effects, transposable elements (TEs) are major constituents of eukaryote genomes in general and of plant genomes in particular. Although the proportion of the genome made up of TEs varies at least four-fold across plants, the relative importance of the evolutionary forces shaping variation in TE abundance and distributions across taxa remains unclear. Under several theoretical models, mating system plays an important role in governing the evolutionary dynamics of TEs. Here, we use the recently sequenced Capsella rubella reference genome and short-read whole genome sequencing of multiple individuals to quantify abundance, genome distributions, and population frequencies of TEs in three recently diverged species of differing mating system, two self-compatible species (C. rubella and C. orientalis) and their self-incompatible outcrossing relative, C. grandiflora.ResultsWe detect different dynamics of TE evolution in our two self-compatible species; C. rubella shows a small increase in transposon copy number, while C. orientalis shows a substantial decrease relative to C. grandiflora. The direction of this change in copy number is genome wide and consistent across transposon classes. For insertions near genes, however, we detect the highest abundances in C. grandiflora. Finally, we also find differences in the population frequency distributions across the three species.ConclusionOverall, our results suggest that the evolution of selfing may have different effects on TE evolution on a short and on a long timescale. Moreover, cross-species comparisons of transposon abundance are sensitive to reference genome bias, and efforts to control for this bias are key when making comparisons across species.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-602) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Despite having predominately deleterious fitness effects, transposable elements (TEs) are major constituents of eukaryote genomes in general and of plant genomes in particular

  • Paired-end Illumina reads from multiple individuals from all three species (8 C. grandiflora, 10 C. orientalis, and 24 C. rubella individuals) were mapped to a repeat-masked C. rubella reference genome [39], and a TE database [39] with repeats from seven Brassicaceae species (A. thaliana, Arabidopsis lyrata, Arabis alpina, Brassica rapa, Capsella rubella, Eutrema halophila, Schrenkiella parvulum)

  • We find a trend to more insertions within 1,000 bp of genes in C. grandiflora compared to the other species (Figure 4), with C. orientalis again having the lowest TE density near genes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite having predominately deleterious fitness effects, transposable elements (TEs) are major constituents of eukaryote genomes in general and of plant genomes in particular. The proportion of the genome made up of TEs varies at least four-fold across plants, the relative importance of the evolutionary forces shaping variation in TE abundance and distributions across taxa remains unclear. Under several theoretical models, mating system plays an important role in governing the evolutionary dynamics of TEs. Here, we use the recently sequenced Capsella rubella reference genome and short-read whole genome sequencing of multiple individuals to quantify abundance, genome distributions, and population frequencies of TEs in three recently diverged species of differing mating system, two self-compatible species (C. rubella and C. orientalis) and their self-incompatible outcrossing relative, C. grandiflora. The lack of large-scale genomic data for closely related species has precluded comprehensive tests. This problem is rapidly diminishing with the increase in available whole genome. The expected reduction in the effective population size (Ne) in selfers relative to outcrossers [26,27] and the associated reduction in the efficacy of selection may lead to fewer TEs in the genomes of outcrossers [9,28]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call