Abstract

Male and female F2 homozygotes from crosses between MHC-congenic inbred mouse strains were tested for MHC-associated mating preference. In three instances, of the four genotypic combinations so tested, marked MHC-associated mating preference was observed. This result greatly reduces the possibility that the observed mating preferences of MHC-congenic inbred strains can be explained wholly in terms of non-MHC genetic drift, or of residual non-MHC genetic disparity, or of fortuitous acquired strain characteristics unrelated to MHC. In two of the four combinations investigated, the MHC-related mating bias of F2 segregants was similar to that of the genotypically similar inbred parent strains. In a third combination, F2 segregants did not show the mating bias exhibited by the corresponding parent strains. In a fourth combination, F2 segregants displayed an MHC-related mating bias that was evident in the corresponding parental inbred strains only when the colonies of the parent strains had been maintained in isolation from other strains. While the exhibition of mating preference by mice of the same genotypes may differ according to circumstances, as indicated, in no instance was preference reversed. Mating preference in a given combination of MHC genotypes, whenever it was observed, always favored the same MHC haplotype of the two alternative haplotypes represented. It appears that the familial MHC genotypes of mice and the environment in which the colonies are maintained influence their MHC-related mating preference, but it has yet to be decided whether these factors operate by determining exposure to particular MHC haplotypes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.