Abstract

Estimates of last male sperm precedence (P2) are often used to infer mechanisms of sperm competition, a form of post-copulatory sexual selection. However, high levels of mating failure (i.e. copulations resulting in no offspring) in a population can lead to misinterpretations of sperm competition mechanisms. Through simulations, García-González (2004) illustrated how mating failure could cause bimodal distributions of paternity with peaks at P2 = 0 and 1, under a random sperm mixing mechanism. Here, we demonstrate this effect empirically with the seed bug Lygaeus simulans, a species known to exhibit high levels of mating failure (40–60%), using a morphological marker to estimate paternity. Contrary to previous findings in a sister species, we did not find strong evidence for last male sperm precedence. There was a tendency towards last male precedence (P2 = 0.58) but within the expected range for random sperm mixing. Instead, P2 was highly variable, with a bimodal distribution, as predicted by García-González (2004). After taking mating failure into account, the strongest driver of paternity outcome was copulation duration. Furthermore, we found evidence that mating failure could partly be a female-associated trait. Some doubly-mated females were more likely to produce no offspring or produce offspring from two different sires than expected by chance. Therefore, some females are more prone to experience mating failure than others, a result that mirrors an earlier result in male L. simulans. Our results confirm that mating failure needs to be considered when interrogating mechanisms of post-copulatory sexual selection.Significance statementMating failure arises when animals fail to produce offspring across their lifetime. This may be due to a failure to find a mate or a failure to produce offspring after one or more apparently successful matings. Sperm competition is when ejaculates of rival males compete to fertilize a female’s eggs. Estimates of second male paternity (P2) are often used to infer mechanisms of sperm competition (i.e. which male “wins” and how). However, García-González (2004) suggested that high levels of mating failure can skew paternity (i.e. give spuriously high/low levels of P2) and lead to misinterpretations of these mechanisms. We carried out sperm competition experiments on Lygaeus simulans seed bugs using a morphological marker to estimate paternity. We show empirically that mating failure does skew patterns of paternity, causing a bimodal distribution of P2. Therefore, by disrupting patterns of sperm competition, mating failure influences both the action of post-copulatory sexual selection and also our understanding of the mechanisms of sperm competition.

Highlights

  • Post-copulatory sexual selection, which acts on traits expressed during or after copulation (Birkhead and Pizzarri 2002; Dougherty et al 2016), is important for shaping some of the extreme elaborate traits that we see across the animal kingdom and plays a role in the diversification of populations and has the potential to lead to speciation (Arnqvist et al 2000; Birkhead and Pizzarri 2002)

  • Our results provide an empirical demonstration of the simulation models of GarcíaGonzález (2004), which predicted that, under a random sperm mixing mechanism, a population that experiences high levels of mating failure will show a strong bimodal skew in paternity with peaks at P2 = 0 and P2 = 1

  • Without an appreciation of mating failure, the patterns of sperm precedence in L. simulans would fit with a mechanism of sperm competition such as sperm displacement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Post-copulatory sexual selection, which acts on traits expressed during or after copulation (Birkhead and Pizzarri 2002; Dougherty et al 2016), is important for shaping some of the extreme elaborate traits that we see across the animal kingdom and plays a role in the diversification of populations and has the potential to lead to speciation (Arnqvist et al 2000; Birkhead and Pizzarri 2002). The role of sperm competition in post-copulatory sexual selection has long been a topic of interest for evolutionary biologists (Parker 1970; Smith 1984; Birkhead and Møller 1998; Simmons 2001) and understanding the mechanisms of sperm competition are key to understanding how and why these traits are selected for and the implications this has for the evolution of the species (Simmons 2001). We will emphasize the importance of taking mating failure into account when designing and interpreting experiments that use paternity estimates to evaluate mechanisms of sperm competition

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call