Abstract

Many mathematically gifted adolescents are characterized as being indolent, underachieving and unsuccessful despite their high cognitive ability. This is often due to difficulties with social and emotional development. However, research on social and emotional interactions in gifted adolescents has been limited. The purpose of this study was to observe differences in complex social strategic behaviors between gifted and average adolescents of the same age using the repeated Ultimatum Game. Twenty-two gifted adolescents and 24 average adolescents participated in the Ultimatum Game. Two adolescents participate in the game, one as a proposer and the other as a responder. Because of its simplicity, the Ultimatum Game is an apt tool for investigating complex human emotional and cognitive decision-making in an empirical setting. We observed strategic but socially impaired offers from gifted proposers and lower acceptance rates from gifted responders, resulting in lower total earnings in the Ultimatum Game. Thus, our results indicate that mathematically gifted adolescents have deficiencies in social valuation and mentalization.

Highlights

  • Gifted adolescents are known to perform better on various cognitive tasks, including mental rotation [1,2], problem solving [3,4], memory processing [5,6], and global-local processing [7]

  • No significant difference between the average and gifted adolescents was revealed in the distribution of offers by level (Figure 1)

  • Fair offers were significantly more frequent than unfair offers (x2 = 3.963 p = 0.047), but no corresponding difference was found for gifted adolescents (x2 = 2.173; p = 0.140)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gifted adolescents are known to perform better on various cognitive tasks, including mental rotation [1,2], problem solving [3,4], memory processing [5,6], and global-local processing [7]. These gifted adolescents generally have high potential to be outstanding leaders in mathematics, science, or related fields. Gifted adolescents are often judged to be emotionally maladapted to social groups [9,10]. There are controversial results indicating that this view of maladjustment is false [11,12]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call