Abstract

<p style="text-align:justify">The article deals with mathematical literacy in relation to mathematical knowledge and mathematical problems, and presents the Slovenian project NA-MA POTI, which aims to develop mathematical literacy at the national level, from kindergarten to secondary education. All of the topics treated represent starting points for our research, in which we were interested in how sixth-grade primary school students solve non-contextual and contextual problems involving the same mathematical content (in the contextual problems this content still needs to be recognised, whereas in the non-contextual problems it is obvious). The main guideline in the research was to discover the relationship between mathematical knowledge, which is the starting point for solving problems from mathematical literacy (contextual problems), and mathematical literacy. The empirical study was based on the descriptive, causal and non-experimental methods of pedagogical research. We used both quantitative and qualitative research based on the grounded theory method to process the data gathered from how the participants solved the problems. The results were quantitatively analysed in order to compare the success at solving problems from different perspectives. Analysis of the students’ success in solving the contextual and non-contextual tasks, as well as the strategies used, showed that the relationship between mathematical knowledge and mathematical literacy is complex: in most cases, students solve non-contextual tasks more successfully; in solving contextual tasks, students can use completely different strategies from those used in solving non-contextual tasks; and students who recognise the mathematical content in contextual tasks and apply mathematical knowledge and procedures are more successful in solving such tasks. Our research opens up new issues that need to be considered when developing mathematical literacy competencies: which contexts to choose, how to empower students to identify mathematical content in contextual problems, and how to systematically ensure – including through projects such as NA-MA POTI – that changes to the mathematics curriculum are introduced thoughtfully, with regard to which appropriate teacher training is crucial.</p>

Highlights

  • Our introduction is organised into four parts

  • Analysis of the students’ success in solving the contextual and non-contextual tasks, as well as the strategies used, showed that the relationship between mathematical knowledge and mathematical literacy is complex: in most cases, students solve non-contextual tasks more successfully; in solving contextual tasks, students can use completely different strategies from those used in solving non-contextual tasks; and students who recognise the mathematical content in contextual tasks and apply mathematical knowledge and procedures are more successful in solving such tasks

  • We present a Slovenian project on the development of mathematical literacy entitled Science and Mathematical Literacy, the Development of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving (NA-MA POTI), while the third part addresses the issue of solving mathematical problems in connection with contexts from everyday life

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our introduction is organised into four parts. The first part examines the relationship between mathematical literacy and mathematical knowledge. In order to respond to the rapidly changing world as successfully as possible, questions are repeatedly raised about the key competencies that a student should acquire during schooling. We are interested in the development of some of these competencies in mathematics lessons, which we most often refer to as mathematical literacy. The process of changing the understanding of school mathematics in response to changes in the world is increasingly present. 8), in many countries “curriculum reforms have initiated reconsideration of the nature of school mathematics, leading to changes in the selection and organization of mathematical content and increasing emphasis on mathematical thinking processes, practices and ways of working”.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call