Abstract

The nature of depth distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) was examined in 85 soils across New South Wales with the working hypothesis that the depth distribution of SOC is controlled by processes that vary with depth in the profile. Mathematical functions were fitted to 85 profiles of SOC with SOC values at depth intervals typically of 0–5, 5–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–50, 50–60, 60–70, 70–80, 80–90 and 90–100 cm. The functions fitted included exponential functions of the form SOC = A exp (Bz); SOC = A + B exp (Cz) as well as two phase exponential functions of the form SOC = A + B exp (Cz) + D exp (Ez). Other functions fitted included functions where the depth was a power exponent or an inverse term in a function. The universally best-fitting function was the exponential function SOC = A + B exp (Cz). When fitted, the most successful function was the two-phase exponential, but in several cases this function could not be fitted because of the large number of terms in the function. Semi-log plots of log values of the SOC against soil depth were also fitted to detect changes in the mathematical relationships between SOC and soil depth. These were hypothesized to represent changes in dominant soil processes at various depths. The success of the exponential function with an added constant, the two-phase exponential functions, and the demonstration of different phases within the semi-log plots confirmed our hypothesis that different processes were operating at different depths to control the depth distributions of SOC, there being a surface component, and deeper soil component. Several SOC profiles demonstrated specific features that are potentially important for the management of SOC profiles in soils. Woodland and to lesser extent pasture soils had a definite near surface zone within the SOC profile, indicating the addition of surface materials and high rates of fine root turnover. This zone was much less evident under cropping.

Highlights

  • Soil organic carbon (SOC) comprises 50 to 58% of soil organic matter (SOM) [1] and is an indicator of soil health and soil condition, with improvements in these typically being associated with increased amounts of SOC

  • The success of the exponential function with an added constant, the two-phase exponential functions, and the demonstration of different phases within the semi-log plots confirmed our hypothesis that different processes were operating at different depths to control the depth distributions of SOC, there being a surface component, and deeper soil component

  • Management effects on soil carbon at depth are minimal compared to changes that occur in the topsoil [7] and most information on soil carbon responses to different management practices are limited to the upper soil horizons [0–30 cm depth].” [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil organic carbon (SOC) comprises 50 to 58% of soil organic matter (SOM) [1] and is an indicator of soil health and soil condition, with improvements in these typically being associated with increased amounts of SOC. There are two fundamental reasons for managing SOC: improving soil health and soil condition and the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. Soil carbon accounting is usually focused on the surface soil horizons to 30 cm depth, and the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has indicated that:. “For mineral soils, only the top 30 cm are considered, which typically has the highest concentration of carbon and the greatest response to changes in management and land use. Management effects on soil carbon at depth are minimal compared to changes that occur in the topsoil [7] and most information on soil carbon responses to different management practices are limited to the upper soil horizons [0–30 cm depth].” [8].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call