Abstract

Unintended receivers can be an important source of selection on social signals. Vibrational social signals are produced by diverse taxa, but most work on eavesdropping on social communication has focused on airborne signals. Few studies have examined whether predators and parasitoids exploit vibrational social signals, and whether vibrational communication systems have features to reduce apparency to unintended receivers. For a subsocial insect species (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Platycotis vittata), we first used a field playback experiment to show that offspring vibrational signals evoke maternal defense, and that maternal signals can inhibit offspring signaling. We next evaluated two potential benefits of inhibiting offspring signaling. We tested whether such inhibition increases the accuracy of offspring signals, as it does in a closely related species. We also tested whether by inhibiting offspring signals, mothers reduce the risk of attracting eavesdropping predators. Using playback experiments, we found that a vibrationally-sensitive predator attends to offspring but not maternal signals. In contrast, we found no evidence that inhibition increases the accuracy of offspring signals. Because predator eavesdropping is a likely cost of social communication for vibrationally signaling animals, we suggest that mechanisms to reduce apparency of such social signals may be common.

Highlights

  • Predators and parasitoids eavesdrop on airborne mate advertisement and courtship signals to locate prey and hosts, and can act as powerful agents of selection, even driving the evolutionary loss of signaling behavior (Zuk et al, 2006)

  • Mothers signaled at a higher rate and walked for a greater proportion of time when offspring signals were played than when silence was played

  • The offspring in each family produced some vibrational signals during trials, but we found no difference in the number of group signals produced by nymphs according to playback treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predators and parasitoids eavesdrop on airborne mate advertisement and courtship signals to locate prey and hosts (reviewed in Zuk and Kolluru, 1998; Haynes and Yeargan, 1999), and can act as powerful agents of selection, even driving the evolutionary loss of signaling behavior (Zuk et al, 2006). For animals communicating with substrate vibrations, there has been controversy about the potential for predator eavesdropping. Henry (1994) suggested that vibrational communication is essentially a private channel. Other authors have argued that substrate vibration is likely to be among the most vulnerable of modalities to unintended receivers, given the wide array of vibrationally-sensitive taxa (Cocroft and Rodríguez, 2005; Cocroft, 2011; Virant-Doberlet et al, 2019). Zuk and Kolluru’s (1998) review of predator eavesdropping listed no examples from the vibrational modality, more recent studies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call