Abstract
To evaluate maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) levels at 11–14 weeks of gestation and preeclampsia risk in women with common congenital anatomic uterine abnormalities (AUAs). First trimester screening markers were compared between 12 AUA pregnancies, 60 age matched controls and 12 cases of early preeclampsia. PAPP-A level and birth weight were significantly lower in AUA compared to control and early preeclampsia group (p<.001). Preeclampsia was absent in the AUAs pregnancies group. Birth weight were similar in AUA group when we compared AUA and control group regarding weeks of gestation at delivery and lower but not significantly, when we compared AUA and early preeclampsia group. Our findings suggest that AUA pregnancies are associated with low first trimester maternal serum PAPP-A concentrations not predictive of susceptibility to preeclampsia. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? During first trimester screening for preeclampsia based on maternal pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) levels, various parameters are used, such as the somatometric characteristics of pregnant woman, single or multiple pregnancy, smoking status, family history, diabetes, hypertension and measurement of blood pressure and uterine artery Dopplers. What do the results of this study add? Our pioneer study revealed that there is drastic difference in PAPP-A concentration in women with common anatomic uterine abnormalities (AUAs), in comparison with their age matched control women with normal uterus. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and further research? Based on our results, uterine anatomical deviations, is another factor which must be taken in account for preeclampsia risk calculation and further clinical consultation and follow up in those pregnancies. Lower PAPP-A levels in AUA cases is a weak predictor of susceptibility to preeclampsia and could be associated to smaller placental size rather than poor placentation and in future research the calculation of the uterine cavity functional dimension may lead to a more accurate clinical assessment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.