Abstract

Severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) accounts for any life-threatening complication during pregnancy or after delivery. Measuring and monitoring SAMM seem critical to assessing the quality of maternal health care. The objectives were to explore the validity of intensive care unit (ICU) admission as an indicator of SAMM by characterizing the profile of women admitted to an ICU and of their ICU stay, according to the association with other SAMM criterion. We performed a secondary analysis of the 2540 women with SAMM included in the epidemiology of severe acute maternal morbidity (EPIMOMS) multiregional prospective population-based study (2012-2013, n = 182,309 deliveries). The EPIMOMS definition of SAMM, based on national experts' consensus, is a combination of diagnosis, organ dysfunctions, and intervention criteria, including ICU admission. Among women with SAMM, we identified characteristics associated with maternal ICU admission with or with no other SAMM criterion compared with ICU admission, by using multivariable multinomial logistic regression models. Overall, 511 women were admitted to an ICU during or up to 42 days after pregnancy, for a population-based rate of 2.8 of 1000 deliveries (511/182,309; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-3.1); 15.5% of them (79/511; 95% CI, 12.4-18.9) had no other SAMM criterion compared with ICU admission. Among women with SAMM, the odds of ICU admission with no other morbidity criterion were increased in women with preexisting medical conditions (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.13; 95% CI, 1.17-3.86) and cesarean before labor (aOR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.47-6.64). Women admitted to ICU with no other SAMM criterion had more often decompensation of a preexisting condition, no interventions for organ support, and a shorter length of stay than women admitted with other SAMM criteria. Among women with SAMM, 1 in 5 is admitted to an ICU; 15.5% of those admitted in ICU have no other SAMM criterion and a less acute condition. These results challenge the use of ICU admission as a criterion of SAMM.

Highlights

  • Severe acute maternal morbidity, accounting for any life-threatening complication during pregnancy or after delivery, is a major issue in maternal health

  • Among women with severe acute maternal morbidity, on multivariable multinomial analysis and adjusting for cause, the odd of intensive care unit admission with another morbidity criterion was increased for migrant from outside of Europe or Africa, with multiple gestation, and intrapartum cesarean

  • 511 women were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) (2.8 per 1000 deliveries [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.6–3.1]), accounting for 20.1% (18.5–21.6) of 2,540 women with severe acute maternal morbidity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Severe acute maternal morbidity, accounting for any life-threatening complication during pregnancy or after delivery, is a major issue in maternal health. Measuring and monitoring it seems critical for assessing the quality of maternal health care. Maternal admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is commonly used as a single indicator of severe acute maternal morbidity [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Two previous studies estimated the proportion of women admitted to an ICU without receiving any intensive care-specific intervention, but both had limitations: one from Southern England conducted 20 years ago was not population-based [10], the other used data not collected to explore maternal morbidity but rather routinely coded data from hospitals in Maryland between 1999 and 2008 to ascertain cases [14]. By improving our knowledge of maternal ICU admissions with no other morbidity criterion with recent prospective population-based detailed data, we could identify potential pitfalls of using maternal ICU admission as a severe acute maternal morbidity indicator

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call