Abstract

BackgroundThere is no consensus on the role of inflammatory markers in identifying chorioamnionitis in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM). We set out to evaluate the accuracy of maternal blood C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin and interleukin 6 (IL6) in diagnosis of histological chorioamnionitis and/or funisitis (HCA/Funisitis) in PPROM.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2020 for studies where maternal blood CRP, procalcitonin or IL6 was assessed against a reference standard of HCA/Funisitis in PPROM. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess methodological quality. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) models were used to construct summary curves. Bivariate models were used to obtain summary estimates for studies with the same cut-off.ResultsWe included 23 studies reporting HCA/Funisitis in 902 of 1717 women, median prevalence 50% (inter-quartile range 38–57). Of these studies, 20 were prospective cohort design and 3 were retrospective cohort. Eleven studies reported the index test against a reference standard of HCA and/or funisitis, 10 reported HCA alone and 2 reported funisitis alone. Many studies had high risk of bias scores on the QUADAS-2 assessment but low concerns for applicability. Sensitivity and specificity for CRP ≥ 20 mg/L (5 studies, 252 participants) was 59% (95% CI 48–69) and 83% (95% CI 74–89) respectively. SROC curves are provided for each index test. At selected specificity of 80%, the sensitivities for CRP (all cut-offs, 17 studies, 1404 participants), PCT ( all cut-offs, 6 studies, 231 participants) and IL6 (all cut-offs, 5 studies, 299 participants) were 59%(95% CI 52–68), 56%(95% CI 50–69) and 52% (95% CI 50–86) respectively.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support use of CRP, procalcitonin or IL6 in maternal blood for diagnosis of HCA/Funisitis in PPROM. This review followed recommended methodology and data analytic methods that made the most of the data regardless of the different cut-offs used. However, the evidence is based on few studies with generally small sample sizes, poor-quality scores and substantial heterogeneity. There is a need for good-quality diagnostic accuracy studies to better assess the role of these biomarkers in PPROM.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42015023899, registered on 8 October 2015.

Highlights

  • There is no consensus on the role of inflammatory markers in identifying chorioamnionitis in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM)

  • There is a need for good-quality diagnostic accuracy studies to better assess the role of these biomarkers in PPROM

  • If inflammatory markers assayed in maternal blood are found to be sufficiently accurate in the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis, they can influence clinical decision-making and reduce reliance on clinical features alone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is no consensus on the role of inflammatory markers in identifying chorioamnionitis in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM). In preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM), the decision for delivery is a delicate balance that considers risks of preterm birth versus risks of infection from continuing pregnancy [1, 2]. If clinical features of infection or inflammation are detected, usually delivery is initiated. These clinical features can be thought of as an existing test. If inflammatory markers assayed in maternal blood are found to be sufficiently accurate in the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis, they can influence clinical decision-making and reduce reliance on clinical features alone. Diagnosis of infection can advise therapeutic interventions such as delivery and antibiotic administration [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.