Maternal characteristics and causes associated with refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a secondary analysis of the WHO CHAMPION trial data.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the maternal characteristics and causes associated with refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH).DesignSecondary analysis of the WHO CHAMPION trial data.SettingTwenty‐three hospitals in ten countries.PopulationWomen from the CHAMPION trial who received uterotonics as first‐line treatment of PPH.MethodsWe assessed the association between sociodemographic, pregnancy and childbirth factors and refractory PPH, and compared the causes of PPH between women with refractory PPH and women responsive to first‐line PPH treatment.Main outcome measuresMaternal characteristics; causes of PPH.ResultsWomen with labour induced or augmented with uterotonics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.35; 95% CI 1.07–1.72), with episiotomy or tears requiring suturing (aOR 1.82; 95% CI 1.34–2.48) and who had babies with birthweights ≥3500 g (aOR 1.33; 95% CI 1.04–1.69) showed significantly higher odds of refractory PPH compared with the reference categories in the multivariate analysis adjusted by centre and trial arm. While atony was the sole PPH cause in 53.2% (116/218) of the women in the responsive PPH group, it accounted for only 31.5% (45/143) of the causes in the refractory PPH group. Conversely, tears were the sole cause in 12.8% (28/218) and 28% (40/143) of the responsive PPH and refractory PPH groups, respectively. Placental problems were the sole cause in 11 and 5.6% in the responsive and refractory PPH groups, respectively.ConclusionWomen with refractory PPH showed a different pattern of maternal characteristics and PPH causes compared with those with first‐line treatment responsive PPH.Tweetable abstractWomen with refractory postpartum haemorrhage are different from those with first‐line treatment responsive PPH.