Abstract

The Semelparity Hypothesis (Tallamy and Brown in Animal Behav 57:727–730, 1999) predicts that among insects with parental care that iteroparity will be rare. It represents two important challenges. First, life history ecologists have sometimes linked extended parental care with iteroparity, not semelparity, as part of a suite of correlated characters associated with K-selective environments. Second, behavioral ecologists have developed theories for the evolution of eusociality that rely upon a subsocial species producing multiple cohorts of offspring, a precondition for offspring allocare and/or inheritance of a social unit. Using a database of invertebrates exhibiting maternal care in Costa (The other insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006), the association between semelparity and maternal care was tested using a broad comparative analysis. Semelparity was found in only 24.5 % of the best-studied representative species. In addition, semelparity was more rare in species that form nests, burrows or galleries (12.1 %) than in species that guard offspring out in the open (45.0 %). Iteroparity was common both among nesting species with non-overlapping broods (serial nesting) and in species where a female produces broods of different aged offspring in the same nest (within-nest iteroparity). It is hypothesized that common factors, particularly rapid juvenile development on high quality resources, facilitated both serial nesting and parental care. Within-nest iteroparity is an essential stage in the evolution of eusociality that has often been overlooked. Recent models of sibling conflict and reproductive spacing suggest that parental care can be an indirect cause of within-nest iteroparity despite the fact that parental investment can lead directly to diminished future reproduction. The reversal of this life history correlation may occur as a result of the transition between asocial and subsocial nesting behavior; analogous reversals may be a frequent outcome of transitions between levels of social organization.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.