Abstract
In this paper, we capture and explore the painterly depictions of materials to enable the study of depiction and perception of materials through the artists’ eye. We annotated a dataset of 19k paintings with 200k+ bounding boxes from which polygon segments were automatically extracted. Each bounding box was assigned a coarse material label (e.g., fabric) and half was also assigned a fine-grained label (e.g., velvety, silky). The dataset in its entirety is available for browsing and downloading at materialsinpaintings.tudelft.nl. We demonstrate the cross-disciplinary utility of our dataset by presenting novel findings across human perception, art history and, computer vision. Our experiments include a demonstration of how painters create convincing depictions using a stylized approach. We further provide an analysis of the spatial and probabilistic distributions of materials depicted in paintings, in which we for example show that strong patterns exists for material presence and location. Furthermore, we demonstrate how paintings could be used to build more robust computer vision classifiers by learning a more perceptually relevant feature representation. Additionally, we demonstrate that training classifiers on paintings could be used to uncover hidden perceptual cues by visualizing the features used by the classifiers. We conclude that our dataset of painterly material depictions is a rich source for gaining insights into the depiction and perception of materials across multiple disciplines and hope that the release of this dataset will drive multidisciplinary research.
Highlights
Throughout art history, painters have invented numerous ways to depict the three-dimensional world onto flat surfaces [1,2,3,4]
The tasks were open to all Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) workers, but after around 2000 bounding boxes were created by 114 AMT users, with manual inspection, we found that the quality of bounding boxes varied greatly between participants
We conducted a diverse set of experiments to demonstrate how our annotated art-perception dataset can drive research across perception, art history, and computer vision
Summary
Throughout art history, painters have invented numerous ways to depict the three-dimensional world onto flat surfaces [1,2,3,4]. Painters are not limited to optical projection [5, 6] and paintings have more freedom. This means that a painter can directly modify and manipulate the 2D image features of the depiction. A painter’s primary concern is not whether a depiction is optically or physically correct. A painting is explicitly designed for human viewing [7, 8]. The artist does not copy a retinal
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.