Abstract
AbstractTo explain the variance in core hardness of 18CrNi8 nozzle bodies after industrial heat treatment, several data sources, including steel melt composition, sensor process data, and measurement errors, of five years are aggregated. In order to predict hardness variations caused by alloy composition, traditional physical models by Maynier are compared with data‐driven machine learning models, which show no advantage due to low data variability. Neither method can fully explain the visible drifts, which are better tracked by an alternative (i. e., filter model) that uses past measurements. Machine learning on features from heat treatment is not successful in predicting hardness change, presumably because the process is too stable. Finally, a large part of the variance is caused by the HV 1 measurement error.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
