Abstract
Restoration goals for damaged freshwater habitats can bedefinedaccording to ecological as well as to chemical criteria. Fordisturbed lakes, the sediment microfossil record can be usedtoselect potential modern analogue sites as possible restorationtarget ecosystems.Fossil diatom assemblages in two acidified lakes (Round LochofGlenhead and Loch Dee) in Galloway, Scotland, were comparedfloristically with modern surface sediment samples from ca. 200lakes in Britain, Ireland, Sweden and Norway using numericaltechniques. Mean squared Chi-squared dissimilarity (SCD)valuesbased on between sample Chi-square distance measures were usedtocompare samples.‘Space-for-time substitution’ using diatom assemblage matchingtechniques identified several modern analogue sites withHebrideanLoch Teanga and Irish Lough Claggan possessing modern diatomflorasmost similar to those which existed at the Round Loch ofGlenheadand Loch Dee before acidification.From the point of view of atmospheric pollution, the mostcloselymatching modern analogue sites were not necessarily in themostpristine regions. Some analogues occurred in UK regions ofmoderateor low acid deposition and modern diatom assemblages inatmospherically cleaner mid Norway were generally less similarfloristically.It is argued that identification of modern analogue sitesraisesthe possibility of using time-space substitution of closelymatchedmodern and fossil samples to infer whole lake ecosystems.Diatoms are however poor indicators of some water chemistryvariables and the two closest matched modern analogue siteshavetoo high calcium concentrations making faunistic comparisonsquestionable.Identification of good modern analogue lakes can be improvedbyusing selection criteria, other than diatoms, to pre-selectsites.Screening inappropriate sites according to water chemistry andbasin features combined with a larger biological database ofmodernand fossil samples offers a promising way of refining theselectionprocesses.Despite necessary refinements, modern analogue matching canpotentially identify whole lake ecosystems that can serve asbiological target communities for currently disturbed sites.Beingbased on biological rather than chemical criteria, thisapproachdoes not rely on species-water chemistry transfer functions.It istherefore directly relevant to lake conservation andrestorationobjectives and offers an alternative method for reconstructing lakepalaeo-environments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.