Abstract

BackgroundThe refractive surgeries induce corneal higher order aberrations (C-HOAs). In this study, change of C-HOAs after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) compared to femtosecond assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK), and to photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C (PRK) under photopic and mesopic conditions.MethodsIn this prospective study, age, gender, and apical corneal thickness (ACT) matched cases with moderate myopia [spherical equivalent (SE) 3.00 to 6.00D) to high myopia (SE > 6.00D)] were enrolled. In addition to visual acuity and refraction, total C-HOA, coma, spherical aberration (SA), and trefoil in the 3- and 6-mm zones were measured before and 3 and 6 months after surgery.ResultsOverall, 372 moderate myopia cases (124 eyes of 124 individuals in each surgical group) and 171 high myopia cases (57 eyes of 57 individuals in each surgical group) were enrolled. At baseline, the differences in age, gender, ACT, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, and SE were not statistically significant between subgroups of surgical methods within each myopia group (all P > 0.05). At 12 months, in the moderate myopia group, there was less increase in 6-mm zone total C-HOA, coma, and SA with SMILE compared to the other groups (all P < 0.05). In the high myopia group, there was greater increase in photopic total C-HOA and trefoil and less increase in mesopic SA with SMILE (all P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn correction of moderate myopia, SMILE has better results in mesopic condition. In high myopia correction, femto-LASIK and PRK have better results in photopic and SMILE in mesopic condition.

Highlights

  • The refractive surgeries induce corneal higher order aberrations (C-HOAs)

  • The aim of the present study was compare corneal higher order aberrations (C-HOA) in the 3 and 6 mm zones induced by small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) compared to two conventional refractive surgical methods in moderate and high myopia using a matched design

  • Total C-HOA The findings of the present study in individuals with moderate myopia (3.0 to 6.0 D) and low astigmatism (< 2.0D) suggest that there is no difference between SMILE and femto-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or between SMILE and photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C (PRK) in terms of C-HOA induction when assessments are done under photopic conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Change of CHOAs after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) compared to femtosecond assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK), and to photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C (PRK) under photopic and mesopic conditions. Several studies have shown its visual and refractive outcomes individually or in comparison with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Comparison of SMILE with laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for mild myopia (SE < 3.0D) suggested SMILE to be the preferred method due to less induced aberrations and better patient satisfaction [6]. In these studies, aberrations were not compared under photopic and mesopic conditions. This is while aberrations vary by pupil size [7] and should be considered for a more accurate comparison

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call