Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of obesity on the internal mechanical work, and its influence on the total mechanical work, energy cost, and mechanical efficiency in obese and nonobese adults while walking at different speeds. Body composition and anthropometrical characteristics were obtained for eleven obese [O; 39.9 ± 7.9 yr; body mass index (BMI): 43.0 ± 4.2 kg/m2] and thirteen lean adults (L; 29.6 ± 5.7 yr; BMI: 22.0 ± 1.5 kg/m2). Participants walked at five speeds (0.56, 0.83, 1.11, 1.39, 1.67 m/s) while oxygen consumption was measured to obtain net energy cost of walking (NCw). A motion analysis system and instrumented treadmill were combined to obtain external (Wext), internal (Wint), and total (Wtot) mechanical work, and pendular energy recovery. Mechanical efficiency was calculated as the ratio of Wtot to NCw. Relative NCw (per unit body mass) was significantly higher in O than L (P ≤ 0.001). Relative Wext was significantly lower in O compared with L (P = 0.002), whereas no significant difference was found in relative Wint (P = 0.16) and Wtot (P = 0.6). Recovery was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.001), while mechanical efficiency was significantly lower in O than in L (P ≤ 0.001). These results suggest that individuals with obesity class III have similar mass-normalized Wint and Wtot compared with their lean counterparts, along with a higher relative NCw. Consequently, the efficiency of walking was reduced in this population. These results suggest that mass-normalized Wint is unaffected by obesity and is not responsible for the higher relative NCw and lower efficiency of walking in these individuals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY It has been suggested that internal mechanical work (i.e., the work required to move the limbs with respect to the center of mass, Wint) may be responsible for the higher net cost of walking in obese adults, but this variable has not yet been studied in individuals with obesity. The main finding of the present study is that individuals with class III obesity exhibit a similar amount of mass-normalized Wint to that of adults with a normal body weight, suggesting that body mass-relative Wint is not affected by obesity and is not responsible for the higher energy cost and the lower efficiency of walking in this population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.