Abstract
ContextMaximising insect pollination of mass-flowering crops is a widely-discussed approach to sustainable agriculture. Management actions can target landscape-scale semi-natural habitat, cropping patterns or field-scale features, but little is known about their relative effectiveness.ObjectiveTo test how landscape composition (area of mass-flowering crops and semi-natural habitat) and field-scale habitat (margins and hedges) affect pollinator species richness, abundance, and pollen deposition within crop fields.MethodsWe surveyed all flower visitors (Diptera, Coleoptera and Hymenoptera) in oilseed rape fields and related them to landscape composition and field features. Flower visitors were classified as bees, non-bee pollinators and brassica specialists. Total pollen deposition by individual taxa was estimated using single visit pollen deposition on stigmas combined with insect abundance.ResultsThe area of mass-flowering crop had a negative effect on the species richness and abundance of bees in fields, but not other flower visitors. The area of semi-natural habitat in the surrounding landscape had a positive effect on bees, but was not as important as the area of mass-flowering crop. Taxonomic richness and abundance varied significantly between years for non-bee pollinators. Greater cover of mass-flowering crops surrounding fields had a negative effect on pollen deposition, but only when non-bee pollinator numbers were reduced.ConclusionsManagement choices that result in landscape homogenisation, such as large areas of mass-flowering crops, may reduce pollination services by reducing the numbers of bees visiting fields. Non-bee insect pollinators may buffer these landscape effects on pollen deposition, and management to support their populations should be considered.
Highlights
At the global scale, the ecosystem services provided by pollinating insects are estimated to be worth around 7–8% of the total value of agricultural food production (IPBES 2016)
Management choices that result in landscape homogenisation, such as large areas of mass-flowering crops, may reduce pollination services by reducing the numbers of bees visiting fields
When local factors were included in the model, the top model included the area of insect-pollinated plants in the margin (Table 1), which was positively related to the taxonomic richness of flower visitors, the effect size was close to zero
Summary
The ecosystem services provided by pollinating insects are estimated to be worth around 7–8% of the total value of agricultural food production (IPBES 2016). Maintaining this service is threatened by declines in pollinating insects over many regions of the world (Biesmeijer et al 2006; NRC 2007). Agricultural landscapes with a higher proportion of semi-natural habitat have been shown to benefit pollinator species richness and abundance (e.g. Kennedy et al 2013; Woodcock et al 2013), increase temporal stability of pollinator communities (Garibaldi et al 2011) and improve the yield of pollinatordependent mass-flowering crops (Bartomeus et al 2014; Garibaldi et al 2013). Semi-natural habitats provide more nest sites such as tussocky grasses, dead wood and undisturbed soil than mass-flowering crops (Lye et al 2009)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
