Abstract
Psychiatry today is an enterprise beset by paradox. Its practitioners in the 1980s have reasserted clinical and cultural authority by reaffirming their medical identity. This reaffirmation rests on an increasingly credible biologic basis. Developments in the somatic treatment of depression, anxiety disorders, and the psychoses have been steady. Dramatic advances in the neurosciences may portend a new surge in clinical innovation. Yet, in basing their case for legitimacy on their claim to biologic physicianhood, psychiatrists risk undermining the credibility of much that they can offer. For in its most extreme form, the biologic ideal reduces to a cartoon that permits no place for psychiatry's rich diversity of psychological and social interventions. The Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook avoids this error. The product of a single, medically oriented department of psychiatry, its main focus is the psychiatrist's role as consultant in the general hospital. Its 30 compact chapters address myriad dimensions of
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
