Abstract

Mass transfer in fluidized beds is an important operation for separation processes. Two effects can be achieved by using fluidized beds in mass transfer processes increasing interface area and relative movement between the phases. These effects are both desirable because they lead to greater process rates. This paper presents an experimental investigation regarding mass transfer from the wall of a column to the fluid in a fluidized bed of inert spherical particles. The experiments were conducted in column 40 mm in diameter with spherical particles 0,8-3 mm in diameter and water as one fluidizing fluid. The method of dissolution of benzoic acid was used to provide very low mass flux. The average wall-to-fluid mass transfer coefficients were determined for two systems: single-phase fluid flow and a fluidized bed of inert particles The measurements encompassed a Reynolds number range from 100-4000 for single-phase flow and 600-4000 in fluidized beds. The mass transfer coefficients for both systems were calculated from weight loss of benzoic acid. The effects of superficial liquid velocity and particle diameter on the mass transfer coefficient were investigated. It was found that mass transfer was more intensive in the fluidized bed in comparison with single phase flow. The best conditions for mass transfer were reached at a minimum fluidization velocity, when the mass transfer coefficient had the greatest value. The experimental data were correlated in the form: jd = f(Re), where jd is the dimensionless mass transfer factor and Re the Reynolds number.

Highlights

  • QL VORM PHWRGRP UDVWYDUDQMD EHQ]RHYH NLVHOLQH ,VSLWLYDQ MH XWLFDM EU]LQH VWUXMDQMD IOXLGD L NDUDNWHULVWLND HVWLFD QD NRHILFLMHQW SUHOD]D PDVH 2SVHJ LVSLWL.

  • HVWLFD MHGQRID]QL YDQLK 5HMQROGVRYLK EURMHYD ELR MH ]D VWUXMDQMH IOXLGD EH] WRN RG 2 D X IOXLGL]RYDQRP VORMX RG 2 5H]XOWDWL VX SULND]DQL NDR ]DYLVQRVWL EH]GLPHQ]LRQRJ IDNWRUD SUHQRVD PDVH M' RG 5HMQROGVRYRJ EUR MD 5H L 5HMQROGVRYRJ EURMD ]D HVWLFX 5HS 1D RVQRYX HNVSHULPHQWDOQLK UH]XO WDWD SRVWDYOMHQD MH NRUHODFLMD ]D RGUHLYDQMH NRHILFLMHQWD SUHOD]D PDVH X REOLNX ]DYLVQRVWL M' I 5H

  • 8 RYRP UDGX VX SUHGVWDYOMHQL HNVSHULPHQWDOQR GR ELMHQL SRGDFL ]D NRHILFLMHQW SUHOD]D PDVH ]LG NRORQH2IOXLG ]D VWUXMDQMH LVWRJ IOXLGD NUR] YHUWLNDOQX FHY L X SULVXVWYX LQHUWQLK IOXLGL]RYDQLK HVWLFD 3ULND]DQ MH XWLFDM EU]LQH IOX LGD L SUH QLND HVWLFD QD LQWHQ]LWHW SUHQRVD PDVH 1D RVQRYX GRELMHQLK UH]XOWDWD SRVWDYOMHQH VX HPSLULMVNH NR UHODFLMH ]D RED LVSLWLYDQD VLVWHPD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

QL VORM PHWRGRP UDVWYDUDQMD EHQ]RHYH NLVHOLQH ,VSLWLYDQ MH XWLFDM EU]LQH VWUXMDQMD IOXLGD L NDUDNWHULVWLND HVWLFD QD NRHILFLMHQW SUHOD]D PDVH 2SVHJ LVSLWL.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call