Abstract

ABSTRACTMany correlative and experimental studies indicate that the portrayal of alcohol in the mass media impacts viewers’ alcohol expectancies, attitudes, and behaviors. Based on social cognitive theory, the portrayed consequences and the valence of the character experiencing these consequences are important to consider when investigating the portrayal of alcohol in the mass media. However, experimental studies manipulating character valence and consequences are scarce. This study presents an experimental examination of an adult sample, manipulating the occurrence of consequences (no consequences, positive consequences, and negative consequences), as well as character valence (a positive or negative character). We investigated the effects of media portrayals on positive and negative alcohol expectancies, as well as on attitudes toward alcohol. Furthermore, the moderating role of participants’ level of alcohol consumption was considered. We found main effects only on the negative alcohol expectancies, supporting the differentiation of alcohol expectancies and attitudes. However, the valence of the depicted character did not moderate the impact of the portrayed consequences. Interaction effects of participants’ individual levels of alcohol consumption and portrayals of consequences of alcohol consumption in the mass media were uncovered. This finding has important implications for further research and prevention efforts directed at risk groups.

Highlights

  • Many correlative and experimental studies indicate that the portrayal of alcohol in the mass media impacts viewers’ alcohol expectancies, attitudes, and behaviors

  • This study presents an experimental examination of an adult sample, manipulating the occurrence of consequences, as well as character valence

  • Sociability For positive alcohol expectancies regarding sociability, we found no main effects for the positive consequences condition (b = –.06, SE = .19, β = –.04, p = .76) and no effect of the negative consequences condition (b = .07, SE = .18, β = .05, p = .71) compared to the control condition

Read more

Summary

Method

We collected the data for this study at a primary healthcare center in Austria in September, 2016. The experiment had a 3 (consequence: negative vs no consequence vs positive) × 2 (valence: positive vs negative) between-subjects design. Participants were randomly exposed to one version of the stimulus movie followed by a questionnaire

Procedure
Results
Discussion
Limitations
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call