Abstract

Mass cultures of Tetraselmis suecica were carried out with four nutrient concentrations, ranging from 2 to 16 mM of NaNO 3 and salinity 35‰. An air flow of 15 l/min maintained a CO 2 transference rate sufficient to keep the pH below 8.4. Using these cultural conditions equations were calculated, by a multiple non-linear least squares regression of order four, enabling predictions to be made of growth kinetics and chemical composition. Maximum cellular densities of 7.83 × 10 6 and 7.15 × 10 6 cells/ml were obtained with 8 and 16 mM of NaNO 3, respectively. Growth velocity ranged between 0.53 and 0.63 doublings (dbl)/day, although 0.98 dbl/day were reached with 16 mM of NaNO 3. Volume increased with nutrient concentration from 252 to 905 μm 3. Protein content reached maximum values of 306 μg/ml or 59.8 pg/cell. In the logarithmic phase, protein was regulated by nutrient concentration and decreased according to this concentration. Maximum efficiency of transformation from nitrate to protein was 108%, obtained at 2 mM of NaNO 3. Efficiency decreased, to 14%, when nutrient concentration increased. This fact indicates that the lowest cost of harvesting is obtained with a nutrient concentration of 2 mM NaNO 3. Chlorophyll a cell reached values between 3.1 and 3.8 pg/cell in the stationary phase. There was a relationship between nutrient concentration and chlorophyll a cell in the logarithmic phase, with an increase from 2.15 pg/cell to 3.74 pg/cell. Changes in chlorophyll a level are related to nitrogen depletion. Carbohydrate/cell was constant at values of 19.84–28.68 pg/cell in the logarithmic and stationary phases and was not related to nitrogen depletion. RNA/cell ranged from 4.17 to 5.48 pg/cell, except at 2 mM of NaNO 3 when it was 2.77 pg/cell, probably due to nitrogen depletion. The level of DNA/cell was constant in all the nutrient concentrations assayed and ranged from 0.1 to 1.09 pg/cell. Great variability in the chemical composition of T. suecica has been shown. Growth in mass cultures is closely coupled to changes in nutrient concentrations and variations occur in protein, chlorophyll a and RNA content, showing differences of 215%, 190% and 203%, respectively, in the stationary phase. This biochemical variability, mainly in protein content, must have a marked effect on the nutritive value of this microalga as feed in mariculture.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call