Masking ability of indirect restorative systems on tooth-colored resin substrates

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the masking ability of different indirect restorative systems (IRS) on tooth-colored resin substrates. MethodsA1-shaded specimens from 5 IRS (LDC–IPS e.max® CAD; YZW-Zenostar Zr Translucent; PICN-Enamic; YLD-T-IPS e.max® ZirCAD + IPS e.max Ceram; CAD-on-Zenostar Zr Translucent + Crystall./Connect + IPS e.max® CAD) were fabricated. Specimens (n = 5) were cemented with a resin luting agent (Variolink® N; shade White) on three different shades (ND3, ND8 and ND9) of a tooth-colored resin substrate (IPS Natural Die Material). Spectral reflectance and color coordinates were measured using a spectroradiometer under standardized lighting conditions (CIE D65 illumination) and optical geometry 0/45°. Color differences (ΔEab* and ΔE00) from cemented specimens and CIELAB- and CIEDE2000-based translucency parameter (TP and TP00) from non-cemented specimens were calculated. Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α = 0.05). ΔE values were also analyzed using perceptibility (PT = 1.22 ΔEab* units; 0.81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT = 2.66 ΔEab* units; 1.77 ΔE00 units) thresholds. ResultsThe cemented specimens of CAD-on, LDC, YZW and PICN on different substrates (ND3–ND8, ND3–ND9 and ND8–ND9) showed different ΔEab* and ΔE00 values (p ≤ 0.05), which were above AT. YLD-T showed ΔEab* and ΔE00 values below AT for all comparisons. Lowest and highest TP and TP00 values were obtained for YLD-T and PICN, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). SignificanceResin-cemented YLD-T on different tooth-colored substrates showed less translucency as well as smaller color differences (below acceptability threshold), indicating the best masking ability among evaluated systems.