Abstract

Marx’s scientific revolution is not an intervention into a certain specific theory of political economy, but an intervention in the form of critique of fundamental presuppositions of political economy in general. Hence, the theoretical apparatus of the critique of political economy can also be used as a tool for intervening into the field of contemporary social sciences, particularly into neoclassical political economy and modern bourgeois sociology, insofar as they are based precisely on the presuppositions that are the object of Marx’s critique. Following Michael Heinrich’s interpretation of Marx’s critical theory, the article argues that Marx’s critique of political economy consists of four fundamental breaks with the theoretical field of classical political economy, that is, with the latter’s anthropologism, individualism, empiricism and ahistoricism. This critique is primarily directed not toward individual theories of political economy, but toward the presuppositions shared by all theories of political economy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.