Abstract
This paper provides a further empirical evaluation of the Neoclassical theory of distribution as opposed to Marx-biased technical change (MBTC) by applying the theoretical and empirical framework developed by Foley and Michl (1999), Michl (1999, 2009) and Basu (2010) to a panel of countries. Basu (2010) developed a test based on cross-sectional data: we argue that a panel data analysis is instrumental in increasing the efficiency and validity of the test. Our results generalize Basu’s findings in providing support for MBTC and against the Neoclassical theory of income distribution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
