Abstract

We study the defect groups of {D}_p^b (G) theories using geometric engineering and BPS quivers. In the simple case when b = h∨(G), we use the BPS quivers of the theory to see that the defect group is compatible with a known Maruyoshi-Song flow. To extend to the case where b ≠ h∨(G), we use a similar Maruyoshi-Song flow to conjecture that the defect groups of {D}_p^b (G) theories are given by those of G(b)[k] theories. In the cases of G = An, E6, E8 we cross check our result by calculating the BPS quivers of the G(b)[k] theories and looking at the cokernel of their intersection matrix.

Highlights

  • As studied in [8], given the above type of the geometry, we expect some of these 4d theories to have 1-form symmetries

  • We study the defect groups of Dpb(G) theories using geometric engineering and BPS quivers

  • As we will see when we do dimensional reduction to 4d, only a commuting subset of the flux operators in 10d can be realised in 4d to give rise to the operators generating the 1-form symmetries in 4d

Read more

Summary

Geometric origin

We give a short review on how to find the discrete higher form symmetries of geometric engineered field theories following the methods developed in [8]. The operators φσ, with σ a torsional class in the first K-theory group of the boundary K1(∂M10), measuring the torsional part of flux expectation values for the IIB supergravity fields at infinity on a cycle Poincaré dual to σ do not commute [17, 18]. Fixing a boundary condition at infinity for the fluxes corresponds to picking a specific state in the Hilbert space. Not all theories have a maximally isotropic subgroup L that is invariant under large diffeomorphisms of the boundary ∂M10 This means the partition vector Z| = i zi |σi, L0 ∗ defined in terms of the dual basis vectors |σi, L0 ∗ of the Hilbert space, and the partition function which depend on the choice of L, are not invariant under such transformations

Defect groups from BPS quivers
Defect group from Orlik’s conjecture
Defect group and Maruyoshi-Song flows
Orlik’s algorithmic approach
Extension to E6 and E8 cases
A A quick review of the polar curve method
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.