Abstract

This is an expository review paper illustrating the “martingale method” for proving many-server heavy-traffic stochastic-process limits for queueing models, supporting diffusion-process approximations. Careful treatment is given to an elementary model – the classical infinite-server model M/M/∞, but models with finitely many servers and customer abandonment are also treated. The Markovian stochastic process representing the number of customers in the system is constructed in terms of rate-1 Poisson processes in two ways: (i) through random time changes and (ii) through random thinnings. Associated martingale representations are obtained for these constructions by applying, respectively: (i) optional stopping theorems where the random time changes are the stopping times and (ii) the integration theorem associated with random thinning of a counting process. Convergence to the diffusion process limit for the appropriate sequence of scaled queueing processes is obtained by applying the continuous mapping theorem. A key FCLT and a key FWLLN in this framework are established both with and without applying martingales.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how to do martingale proofs of many-server heavy-traffic limit theorems for queueing models, as in Krichagina and Puhalskii [37] and Puhalskii and Reiman [53]

  • For the more elementary models, we show how key steps in the proof - a functional central limit theorem (FCLT) ((59)) and a functional weak law of large numbers (FWLLN) (Lemma 4.3) - can be done without martingales as well as with martingales

  • The martingale structure can be used to establish stochastic boundedness of the scaled queueing processes, which we show implies required fluid limits or functional weak laws of large numbers (FWLLN’s) for random-time-change stochastic processes, needed for an application of the continuous mapping theorem with the composition map

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how to do martingale proofs of many-server heavy-traffic limit theorems for queueing models, as in Krichagina and Puhalskii [37] and Puhalskii and Reiman [53]. For the more elementary Markovian models considered here, these many-server heavy-traffic limits were originally established by other methods, but new methods of proof have been developed. We want to do more than achieve a quick proof for the simple models, which need not rely so much on martingales; we want to illustrate martingale methods that may prove useful for more complicated models

The Classical Markovian Infinite-Server Model
The QED Many-Server Heavy-Traffic Limiting Regime
Literature Review
Organization
Sample-Path Constructions
Random Time Change of Unit-Rate Poisson Processes
Random Thinning of Poisson Processes
Construction from Arrival and Service Times
Martingale Representations
Martingale Basics
Quadratic Variation and Covariation Processes
Counting Processes
First Martingale Representation
Second Martingale Representation
Third Martingale Representation
Fourth Martingale Representation
Continuity of the Integral Representation
Poisson FCLT Plus the CMT
Fluid Limit Without Martingales
Tightness
Stochastic Boundedness
Connection to Tightness
Preservation
Stochastic Boundedness for Martingales
FWLLN from Stochastic Boundedness
Fluid Limit from Stochastic Boundedness in D
Stochastic Boundedness of the Quadratic Variations
The Initial Conditions
Limit from the Fourth Martingale Representation
Other Models
Erlang A Model
Finite Waiting Rooms
General Non-Markovian Arrival Processes
The Martingale FCLT
Conclusion
Applications of the Martingale FCLT
Proof of the Poisson FCLT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.