Abstract

[full article and abstract in English] This article reviews the existing academic literature that compares and explains the differences between the US and the EU’s external actions. An analytical matrix is devised to group publications by level of analysis (micro-, mid-, and macro) and by theme of comparison criteria. The key findings are that in the macro level of analysis, authors tend to compare the role actors have in international relations before claiming either that the EU is a different kind of power due to its peculiar historical experience, or that the EU is weak due to its complicated structure and lack of military capacities. Furthermore, authors conducting their analyses at the micro level tend to find more similarities between the EU and the US’s external actions than those working at the macro level. The article concludes by making a point in favour of further comparisons as an essential tool to better understand the EU and other actors in international relations.

Highlights

  • The European Union (EU) often pictures itself as different than other traditional powers, especially in its relations with developing countries

  • This review is concerned with three key lines of exploration: 1) How can we compare the EU’s foreign policies to those of the traditional actor—a state—in international relations (IR)? 2) When comparisons are made between the EU and traditional actors, what differences and similarities do we find and how do we explain them? 3) What do existing comparisons say about the EU as an actor in IR?

  • Different related academic discussions presented in this article lead to the following observations regarding the particularities of the EU’s external actions and the utility of comparison

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Union (EU) often pictures itself as different (i.e., more normative, civilian, or, generally more benign) than other traditional powers, especially in its relations with developing countries. Authors from a variety of subfields in international relations (IR) ranging from regionalism (Grugel, 2004; Escribano, 2007; Hettne and Ponjaert, 2014) to security studies (Cox, 2003; Kagan, 2002) observe similar differences between the EU and the US. Some claim that these actors prefer different models of cooperation with other countries and regions, and represent. Mars and Venus in Action? The US and EU’s foreign relations strategies in academic discourse

Comparing Apples and Oranges
Analytical matrix of comparative literature
Qualitatively different model of EU cooperation?
Into the details
Into the details: democratization studies
Overview of the comparison
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call