Abstract

It is shown that c1nmax{k + 1, logn} ≤ sup 06=p∈Pc n,k ‖p‖[−1,1] ‖p‖[−1,1] ≤ c2nmax{k + 1, logn} with absolute constants c1 > 0 and c2 > 0, where P n,k denotes the set of all polynomials of degree at most n with complex coefficients and with at most k (0 ≤ k ≤ n) zeros in the open unit disk. Here ‖ · ‖[−1,1] denotes the supremum norm on [−1, 1]. This result should be compared with the inequalities c3n(k + 1) ≤ sup 06=p∈Pn,k ‖p‖[−1,1] ‖p‖[−1,1] ≤ c4n(k + 1) , where c3 > 0 and c4 > 0 are absolute constants and Pn,k denotes the set of all polynomials of degree at most n with real coefficients and with at most k (0 ≤ k ≤ n) zeros in the open unit disk. This second result has been known for a few years, and it may be surprising that there is a significant difference between the real and complex cases as far as Markov-type inequalities are concerned. Let Pn(r) denote the set of all polynomials of degree at most n with real coefficients and with no zeros in the union of open disks with diameters [−1,−1+2r] and [1− 2r, 1], respectively (0 < r ≤ 1). Let P n(r) denote the set of all polynomials of degree at most n with complex coefficients and with no zeros in the union of open disks with diameters [−1,−1+2r] and [1− 2r, 1], respectively (0 < r ≤ 1). An essentially sharp Markov-type inequality for P n(r) on [−1, 1] is also established that should be compared with the analogous result for Pn(r) proved in an earlier paper. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 41A17.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call