Abstract

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES HAVE STRONG ECOnomic interests in influencing physician prescribing behaviors. They advertise directly to consumers and to physicians. Beyond general marketing, manufacturers promote their drugs to physicians through “detailing”—sales representatives (“detailers”) visiting medical offices to persuade physicians to prescribe their products. By law, pharmacies receive specific information with every prescription, including the physician’s name, the drug, and the dosage. Pharmacies sell these records to prescription drug intermediaries (data miners), who use advanced computing to analyze prescriber-identified information (which physicians prescribe what drugs, in what dosages, and with what prescribing patterns). Data miners, in turn, lease sophisticated reports to pharmaceutical companies to refine detailers’ marketing tactics, armed with knowledge about physician prescribing practices—for example, who are high or low prescribers and early or late adopters of new drugs. Detailing raises vital health policy questions, including its effects on clinical decision making (safety, quality, and cost) and the patient-physician relationship (privacy and professionalism). Yet private companies claim a First Amendment right to buy and use prescribing data for product marketing. The tensions between privacy and commercial speech have deep implications for public health regulation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.