Abstract
The emissions trading scheme (ETS) has been long advocated to address climate change not only because it is cost effective but also because it can provide economic incentives for the adoption of new technologies. The emissions abatement of the energy-intensive sector covered by ETS is of great significance for the whole nation to attain sustainable and low-carbon development, especially for developing countries. This paper investigates the effect of market power in the emissions trading market on the diffusion of a new emissions abatement technology when firms in the energy-intensive sector interact in an imperfectly competitive output market. In the model, each firm needs to determine the optimal time to adopt the new emissions abatement technology, taking into account its benefits and costs, as well as its rival’s strategic behavior. With this framework, the results suggest that firms will delay adoption of the new emissions abatement technology in the presence of market power. Moreover, when the output demand is larger and more elastic, emissions abatement technology diffusion will occur earlier. It implies that the technology diffusion in the weak elastic sector, such as the Chinese iron and steel sector, may have more barriers than that in the strong elastic sector, such as the Chinese nonferrous metals sector.
Highlights
Economists have long advocated an emissions trading scheme (ETS) to fight against climate change because it is cost effective and because it can provide economic incentives for the adoption of new emissions abatement technologies
This paper provides an analytical framework to investigate the effect of market power in the emission trading market on the diffusion of a new emissions abatement technology when firms interact in an imperfectly competitive output market
This study shows that firms will delay the adoption of the new emissions abatement technology in the presence of market power
Summary
Economists have long advocated an emissions trading scheme (ETS) to fight against climate change because it is cost effective and because it can provide economic incentives for the adoption of new emissions abatement technologies. Based on Hahn’s model framework, Westskog extended to multiple agents with market power [8], and other articles considered the output market and noted that the dominant firm will exercise its market power to raise its rivals’ cost [9,10]. This main finding has been demonstrated by other scholars [5,11,12,13,14]. To reduce the efficiency loss in the permits market affected by market power, some scholars focus on related policy design [20,21]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.