Abstract
George J. Stigler (1985)1 I find much to endorse in Professor Areeda's magisterial presentation: (1) his description of the dubious role of juries as antitrust policymakers; (2) his recognition of the importance of clearly defining those anticompetitive improprieties that spell monopolization; and (3) his acknowledgement of the need for doctrines that do not chill innovative incentives or competitive vigor among even the most powerful enterprises.2 I too join the growing consensus that regards reforms in private treble damage enforcement as timely, since such reforms would not only diminish the sway of juries, but would also avert other excesses that might otherwise warrant cutting substantive antitrust doctrines to the bone.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
