Abstract

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) negatively impacts the quality of life in a large proportion of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). With no cure at present, it is crucial to improve our understanding of how CNP manifests, to develop diagnostic biomarkers for drug development, and to explore prognostic biomarkers for personalised therapy. Previous work has found early evidence of diagnostic and prognostic markers analysing Electroencephalogram (EEG) oscillatory features. In this paper, we explore whether non-linear non-oscillatory EEG features, specifically Higuchi Fractal Dimension (HFD), can be used as prognostic biomarkers to increase the repertoire of available analyses on the EEG of people with subacute SCI, where having both linear and non-linear features for classifying pain may ultimately lead to higher classification accuracy and an intrinsically transferable classifier. We focus on EEG recorded during imagined movement because of the known relation between the motor cortex over-activity and CNP. Analyses were performed on two existing datasets. The first dataset consists of EEG recordings from able-bodied participants (N = 10), participants with chronic SCI and chronic CNP (N = 10), and participants with chronic SCI and no CNP (N = 10). We tested for statistically significant differences in HFD across all pairs of groups using bootstrapping, and found significant differences between all pairs of groups at multiple electrode locations. The second dataset consists of EEG recordings from participants with subacute SCI and no CNP (N = 20). They were followed-up 6 months post recording to test for CNP, at which point (N = 10) participants had developed CNP and (N = 10) participants had not developed CNP. We tested for statistically significant differences in HFD between these two groups using bootstrapping and, encouragingly, also found significant differences at multiple electrode locations. Transferable machine learning classifiers achieved over 80% accuracy discriminating between groups of participants with chronic SCI based on only a single EEG channel as input. The most significant finding is that future and chronic CNP share common features and as a result, the same classifier can be used for both. This sheds new light on pain chronification by showing that frontal areas, involved in the affective aspects of pain and believed to be influenced by long-standing pain, are affected in a much earlier phase of pain development.

Highlights

  • Central neuropathic pain (CNP) is an excruciating secondary consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI)

  • Participants were assessed for CNP 6 months after recording and assigned to one of two groups based on their diagnosis. 10 participants with SCI developed CNP (4 tetraplegic, 4 incomplete SCI); they will collectively be referred to as subacute SCI participants that developed CNP. 10 participants with SCI did not develop pain (4 tetraplegic, 6 incomplete SCI); they will collectively be referred to as subacute SCI participants with no pain

  • Each column represents the activity at each of the 61 EEG channels recorded in Dataset 1, for all repetitions of either Right Hand (RH), Left Hand (LH) or Leg (L) movement imaginations (MI) from participants in groups; able-bodied volunters (AB), participants with chronic SCI and chronic CNP and participants with chronic SCI and no pain, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) is an excruciating secondary consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI). It is thought that the development of CNP in SCI is the result of neuronal hyperexcitability that develops following damage to the spinal cord, eventually resulting in the perception of pain (Wasner et al, 2008; Zeilig et al, 2012; Finnerup et al, 2014). Many studies have shown a relationship between CNP and the reorganisation of the sensorimotor cortex because of sensory losses and changes to the central nervous system (CNS) caused by injury (Wrigley et al, 2009; Gustin et al, 2010). At the cortical level, pain is known to cause thalamocortical dysrhythmia, which presents as increased theta and beta band EEG power, reduced alpha band power and slowed-down dominant alpha frequency (Sarnthein et al, 2006; Stern et al, 2006; Boord et al, 2008; Jensen et al, 2013; Vuckovic et al, 2014, 2018a)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call