Abstract

The concept of `markedness' has been influential in phonology for almost a century, but a recent movement in the field has argued that phonological theories do not need to make reference to the concept; instead, if it is meaningful at all, markedness should be thought of as emergent. In this paper, we propose a simple mathematical model based on the principles of Evolutionary Phonology (EP; Blevins 2004) to explore how a theory without markedness can replicate some of the insights of the markedness-based worldview. We see that markedness can be treated as an epiphenomenon of random, phonetically grounded sound change.

Highlights

  • The concept of ‘markedness’ has been influential in phonology for almost a century, but a recent movement in the field has argued that phonological theories do not need to make reference to the concept; instead, if it is meaningful at all, markedness should be thought of as emergent

  • Haspelmath’s definition strictly only includes token frequency, we can extend the concept to type frequency: a marked segment should appear in fewer words in the lexicon than an unmarked one

  • /q/ appears in fewer languages than /k/, so under this definition, ∗ We would like to thank Ryan Budnick for all the days he spent listening to our ideas about the importance of modeling sound change

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of ‘markedness’ has been influential in phonology for almost a century, but a recent movement in the field has argued that phonological theories do not need to make reference to the concept; instead, if it is meaningful at all, markedness should be thought of as emergent. We see that markedness can be treated as an epiphenomenon of random, phonetically grounded sound change.

Background
Model: random splits and mergers
Predictions: phoneme frequency distributions
Predictions: within-language and across-language frequency
Why splitwise marked segments have low frequency within a language
Predictions: synchronic distributions
Other correlates of markedness
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.