Abstract

ObjectivePrevious studies have reported on marital status and the prevalence of obesity; however, few studies have assessed the prevalence of underweight in relation to marital status. This study aimed to explore the association of obesity and abdominal obesity with marital status among Koreans aged 40–69 years. MethodsWe selected a total of 137,608 participants from the Health Examinees Gem Study for the final analysis. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of obesity with marital status, with controlling for potential confounders. ResultsThe prevalence of underweight was higher in unmarried men (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.25–2.63) and women (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.79–2.61) than in married individuals. Compared to married individuals, a lower prevalence of BMI≥25kg/m2 was observed for those who were unmarried (men: OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62–0.81, women: OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58–0.73) or divorced/separated (men: OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69–0.93, women: OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.98). Interestingly, widowed women showed higher prevalence of BMI≥25kg/m2 (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10–1.25) and abdominal obesity (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16–1.30) compared to married women, and the association persisted only among women in their 50s and 60s. ConclusionsMarried participants showed a higher prevalence of obesity and abdominal obesity than those in other marriage categories except for widowed women.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.