Abstract

Salman Rushdie’s The Moor’s Last Sigh revolves around the Moor who needs to record his genealogical history in order to survive at a madman’s castle and restore his mother’s reputation. While re-telling his family’s story that originated in Granada, parallel to the history of post-independence India, the Moor makes use of his mother Aurora’s magical realist paintings that combine official History with individual histories. Aurora, the oppressive mother figure, dominates the Moor’s narrative through her paintings entitled “The Moor Cycle” and manipulates his story-telling and identity-formation process. In “The Moor Cycle” paintings, she extols the Moor’s deformed body and associates him with the last Sultan Boabdil of Granada. Reshaping the flow of history, the mother-son relationship and its dynamics are as important as the historical backdrop of the narrative. This parallelism between individual histories and the history of India necessitates an allegorical reading, which gives the key role to ‘Aurora the mother.’ Rushdie’s choice of Aurora as the main source of his postmodern narrative and her haunting influence on the Moor’s identity-formation echo the Mother India myth promoted during the Indian nation-building process. The love-hate relationship between the Moor and Aurora, and its effecs on the Moor’s identity will be analyzed by referring to Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection. Rushdie’s association of magical realism with the maternal semiotic chora, his metaphorical use of the Moor’s grotesque body and the abject figures’ potential of breaking the world order based on the law of the father will also be highlighted within the framework of Kristeva’s theory. Therefore, Aurora’s paintings will be read as a feminine form of history-writing that challenges the paternal discourse that writes the official History.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call