Abstract

Current methods for monitoring marine fish (including bony fishes and elasmobranchs) diversity mostly rely on trawling surveys, which are invasive, costly, and time‐consuming. Moreover, these methods are selective, targeting a subset of species at the time, and can be inaccessible to certain areas. Here, we used environmental DNA (eDNA), the DNA present in the water column as part of shed cells, tissues, or mucus, to provide comprehensive information about fish diversity in a large marine area. Further, eDNA results were compared to the fish diversity obtained in pelagic trawls. A total of 44 5 L‐water samples were collected onboard a wide‐scale oceanographic survey covering about 120,000 square kilometers in Northeast Atlantic Ocean. A short region of the 12S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced through metabarcoding generating almost 3.5 million quality‐filtered reads. Trawl and eDNA samples resulted in the same most abundant species (European anchovy, European pilchard, Atlantic mackerel, and blue whiting), but eDNA metabarcoding resulted in more detected bony fish and elasmobranch species (116) than trawling (16). Although an overall correlation between fishes biomass and number of reads was observed, some species deviated from the common trend, which could be explained by inherent biases of each of the methods. Species distribution patterns inferred from eDNA metabarcoding data coincided with current ecological knowledge of the species, suggesting that eDNA has the potential to draw sound ecological conclusions that can contribute to fish surveillance programs. Our results support eDNA metabarcoding for broad‐scale marine fish diversity monitoring in the context of Directives such as the Common Fisheries Policy or the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Highlights

  • Monitoring of marine biodiversity provides a baseline for policy implementation towards a sustainable use of the marine environment and its resources

  • This paper aims to test the potential of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to assess the fish community composition in a large marine area, such as the Bay of Biscay

  • Six species were collected during catches and not detected through eDNA, namely Sprattus sprattus, Trachurus mediterraneus, Boops boops, Zeus faber, Trisopterus luscus, and Capros aper (Table S4); from these, there are no sequences for T. mediterraneus and B. boops in the reference database and the fact that we find T. minutus in eDNA suggest that this could be T. luscus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monitoring of marine biodiversity provides a baseline for policy implementation towards a sustainable use of the marine environment and its resources. Among the traditional methods for surveying marine fauna, trawling has been widely used, as identification and quantification of large volumes of organisms is considered a reliable method for monitoring fish and other marine animal populations (ICES, 2015; Massé, Uriarte, Angélico, & Carrera, 2018). Besides being invasive and time consuming, fish trawling in pelagic environments can be largely selective affecting diversity estimates and knowledge of species composition (Fraser, Greenstreet, & Piet, 2007; ICES, 2004). Alternative methods are needed, and advances in DNA sequencing and bioinformatics have opened new avenues to assess marine biodiversity in a non-invasive manner (Danovaro et al, 2016; Rees, Maddison, Middleditch, Patmore, & Gough, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call