Abstract
This short piece summarises in a synthetic way professor Marian Maciejewski’s ‘personal research interests’ and his own ‘methodological standing’. Methodology was a real cognitive and axiological issue for him, hence the choice of kerygmatic reading of text turned out to be fundamental in his works; one that set the canon of writings to be subjected to a holistic and extremely responsible interpretation. Maciejewski focused his attention on testimonies of troubled and bruised existence of ‘the sin’s shame’. He looked upon masterpieces, reading them closely, critically and with great intensity. Maciejewski took creative awareness (especially romantic one) and formulated a strong synthesis of demands and realisations in such a way that the language of discourse was revised. This language is nowadays used not only to talk about the very phenomena Maciejewski was concerned with.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
