Abstract

Marginal bone loss during bone healing exists around non-submerged dental implants. The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between different degrees of marginal bone loss during bone healing and the salivary microbiome. One hundred patients were recruited, and marginal bone loss around their implants was measured using cone beam computed tomography during a 3-month healing period. The patients were divided into three groups according to the severity of marginal bone loss. Saliva samples were collected from all subjected and were analysed using 16S MiSeq sequencing. Although the overall structure of the microbial community was not dramatically altered, the relative abundance of several taxonomic groups noticeably changed. The abundance of species in the phyla Spirochaeta and Synergistetes increased significantly as the bone loss became more severe. Species within the genus Treponema also exhibited increased abundance, whereas Veillonella, Haemophilus and Leptotrichia exhibited reduced abundances, in groups with more bone loss. Porphyromonasgingivalis, Treponemadenticola and Streptococcus intermedius were significantly more abundant in the moderate group and/or severe group. The severity of marginal bone loss around the non-submerged implant was associated with dissimilar taxonomic compositions. An increased severity of marginal bone loss was related to increased proportions of periodontal pathogenic species. These data suggest a potential role of microbes in the progression of marginal bone loss during bone healing.

Highlights

  • Dental implantation has become a principal, established therapy to restore missing natural teeth in regular clinical practice

  • Marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants is a serious problem,[1,2] and extensive bone loss has long been regarded as one key factor contributing to implant failure.[3,4]

  • We are aware of factors that influence MBL during bone healing, but there is a paucity of knowledge regarding the role of bacteria in the progression of this common complication

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dental implantation has become a principal, established therapy to restore missing natural teeth in regular clinical practice. The rehabilitation technique based on dental implantation can provide a wide variety of treatment options to patients given its high predictability and survival rate, but implants are not completely free of complications and failure. Marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants is a serious problem,[1,2] and extensive bone loss has long been regarded as one key factor contributing to implant failure.[3,4] Since the 1980s, MBL assessment with intra-oral radiographs has been regarded as a critical criterion to assess implant success.[5] The accepted criteria for implant success are defined as 1–1.5 mm of bone loss during the first year after loading and o0.2 mm annually thereafter.[6,7]. Other contributing factors, such as surgical trauma[15] and different restorative protocols,[16] may play a role in this process

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call