Abstract
This study aimed to compare the marginal and internal fit of five-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using digital scans and conventional impressions. Nine master models with three zirconia abutments were scanned with an intraoral scanner (test group), and nine conventional impressions (control group) of these same models were also made. The stone casts from theses impressions were scanned with a laboratory extraoral scanner (D700, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A total of 18 five-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses frameworks (test group, n = 9; control group, n = 9) were manufactured. Marginal and internal fit (in μm) were evaluated using the replica method under micro-computed tomography. Analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare continuous variables across two groups. A level of P <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. The mean ±standard deviation of the marginal fit was 95.03 ±12.74 μm in the test group and 106.02 ±14.51 μm in the control group. The lowest marginal mean value was observed in the test group, with a statistically significant difference comparing to the control group (F = 14. 56, P <0.05). The mean ±standard deviation of the internal fit was 103.61 ±9.32 μm and 106.38 ±7.64 μm, respectively, in the test and control groups, with no statistically significant difference (F = 1.56, P >0.05). The mean values of both groups were clinically acceptable. The five-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated with digital scans showed better fit than conventional impressions group. Within the limitations of this study, these results are encouraging and continued progress in the digital field should allow for more accurate long-span restorations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.