Abstract

Margin of stability (MOS) is considered a measure of mechanical gait stability. Due to broad application of treadmills in gait assessment experiments, we aimed to determine if walking on a treadmill vs. overground would affect MOS during three speed-matched conditions. Eight healthy young participants walked on a treadmill and overground at Slow, Preferred, and Fast speed-matched conditions. The mean and variability (standard deviation) of the MOS in anterior-posterior and mediolateral directions at heel contact were calculated. Anterior-posterior and mediolateral mean MOS values decreased with increased speed for both overground and treadmill; although mediolateral mean MOS was always wider on the treadmill compared to overground. Due to lack of optic flow and different proprioceptive inputs during treadmill walking, subjects may employ strategies to increase their lateral stability on treadmill compared to overground. Anterior-posterior MOS variability increased with speed overground, while it did not change on treadmill, which might be due to the fixed speed of treadmill. Whereas, lateral variability on both treadmill and overground was U-shaped. Walking at preferred speed was less variable (may be interpreted as more stable) laterally, compared to fast and slow speeds. Caution should be given when interpreting MOS between modes and speeds of walking. As sagittal plane walking is functionally unstable, this raises the consideration as to the meaningfulness of using MOS as a global measure of gait stability in this direction.

Highlights

  • To maintain stability during walking, the body’s center of mass (COM) must be controlled effectively with relation to the base of support provided by the feet

  • margin of stability (MOS) ML mean during Fast and Preferred was significantly smaller compared to Slow across both modes of walking (p’s < 0.0001; Effect sizes (ES) range = −6.05 to −1.96)

  • This study investigated if treadmill walking would affect MOS at three different speeds compared to overground at heel contact

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To maintain stability during walking (i.e., gait stability), the body’s center of mass (COM) must be controlled effectively with relation to the base of support provided by the feet. Ultimate lack of this mechanical gait stability is defined as a fall. Margin of stability (MOS) has been adopted to quantify mechanical stability while walking [1,2,3,4]. Combining both position and velocity of COM into a single outcome on a step-to-step basis is a key advantage of MOS compared to other stability measures.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call