Abstract

India’s northeastern states survive in isolation with the rest of India, economically, socially, culturally and politically and it is considered as the most conflict-ridden regions of India and South Asia. However, the isolation of this region from mainland India is primarily a colonial construct and politico-historical reality. During the ancient period, the region acted as a linkage between the Indian subcontinent with East, Southeast and Inner Asia along the southern Silk Route. Trade, culture, faith and people moved through this route from Central China and Southeast Asia. India’s policy formulation during the post-independence period for the northeastern states, and the introduction of the Look East/Act East policy in the late-90s failed to integrate Northeast with the rest of India and South East Asia economically, socially and (or) implicitly culturally. “Look East” policy has failed to become the engine of growth and transform the economy of the Northeast. Alternatively, a long-lasting relationship with Bangladesh and revival of road, railways and water transport system through Bangladesh can become much more cost-effective from the trade perspective. It can become beneficial for the development of the economy and create employment opportunities for northeastern states vis-à-vis West Bengal and Bangladesh.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call