Abstract

The mapping of submarine glacial landforms is largely dependent on marine geophysical survey methods capable of imaging the seafloor and sub-bottom through the water column. Full global coverage of seafloor mapping, equivalent to that which exists for the Earth's land surface, has, to date, only been achieved by deriving bathymetry from radar altimeters on satellites such as GeoSat and ERS-1 (Smith & Sandwell 1997). The horizontal resolution is limited by the footprint of the satellite sensors and the need to average out local wave and wind effects, resulting in a cell size of about 15 km (Sandwell et al. 2001). A further problem in high latitudes is that the altimeter data are extensively contaminated by the presence of sea ice, which degrades the derived bathymetry (McAdoo & Laxon 1997). Consequently, the satellite altimeter method alone is not suitable for mapping submarine glacial landforms, given that their morphological characterization usually requires a much finer level of detail. Acoustic mapping methods based on marine echo-sounding principles are currently the most widely used techniques for mapping submarine glacial landforms because they are capable of mapping at a much higher resolution. Although the accuracy and resolution of echo-sounding methods are continually being improved, the portion of the world's ocean floor that has been acoustically surveyed is increasing only slowly. This lack of coverage is particularly true for those areas of the oceans covered by sea ice and infested with icebergs, where glacial landforms are an abundant component of continental shelf and fjord morphology. This is illustrated by the fact that only about 11% of the Arctic Ocean had been mapped using modern multibeam sonar technology by 2012 when the latest International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) was compiled (Jakobsson et al. 2012). A similar estimate of the mapped portion of the seafloor …

Highlights

  • Efforts have been made in this contribution to illustrate some of the more common artefacts that occur when applying echosounding survey methods because these may interfere with the imaging and interpretation of submarine glacial landforms

  • Before we describe the individual methods in more detail, as well as the key parameters associated with their collection and interpretation, the fundamental common characteristics of the methods are described

  • The horizontal resolution of a sonar survey is governed by several factors: the sampling density; the beam footprint, which is determined by the interaction of the sound wave front with the seafloor; and the mode of bottom detection

Read more

Summary

Mapping submarine glacial landforms using acoustic methods

The accuracy and resolution of echo-sounding methods are continually being improved, the portion of the world’s ocean floor that has been acoustically surveyed is increasing only slowly This lack of coverage is true for those areas of the oceans covered by sea ice and infested with icebergs, where glacial landforms are an abundant component of continental shelf and fjord morphology. 18% of the 30 arc-second large grid cells of the most recent global grid for the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans, released in 2015, are constrained by depth measurements (Weatherall et al 2015) This percentage includes any kind of sounding control point, implying that if only the portion mapped using modern multibeam methods is considered, there may be little more of the world ocean floor surveyed than in the polar oceans.

ACOUSTIC MAPPING METHODS
Echo sounding
Reflection and refraction
Decibel scale
Sonar equation
Importance of sound speed
Beam angle
Spatial resolution
Standard acoustic mapping systems
Multibeam echo sounder
Chirp sonar
Parametric echo sounders
Errors and artefacts
Survey platforms
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call