Abstract
Filtration and prioritization are two basics steps in horizon scanning systems. This article aimed to map stakeholders' preferences in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) regarding filtration and prioritization criteria. Two filtration criteria (time horizon and innovation) and eight prioritization criteria (relevance to epidemiology, health policies, and clinical practice; potential impact on SUS budget, healthcare providers' costs, and mortality; safety; and legal, ethical, and social aspects) were selected. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to map stakeholders' preferences within and between groups. Two groups were more homogeneous and determinant for selection of prioritization criteria. Stakeholders' professional experience had more influence than institutional affiliations. The approach showed transparent criteria selection and analysis of stakeholders' individual preferences.
Highlights
Foram considerados nesta análise os critérios de priorização inicialmente propostos na oficina de trabalho, exceto o critério “potencial impacto orçamentário no SUS” (O) por ter sido escolhido
Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 28:315-20
Summary
Esta seção está dividida nos passos gerais realizados para a construção do estudo, que foram: identificação na literatura dos critérios de filtragem e priorização, seleção dos critérios de filtragem e priorização e análise das preferências dos atores estratégicos na incorporação de tecnologia em saúde
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
